Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 6

Final - Essay Example Firstly, with regards to an identification of the argument, it must be understood that the author’s primary approach is focusing upon the argument that bio-enhancement and the development of humans to manage and change the realities of chromosomal DNA exists, these should not always be used. Moreover, the claim and reason that exists within this article is with respect to an understanding that even though the possibility to create and alter human biology from a laboratory standpoint most certainly exists, a level of bioethics and moral concern for the future fate of this particular industry has thus far constrained individuals that might otherwise be interested in turning a profit via utilizing such an approach. Although the structure and organization of this particular article is above standard, a key concern that can be noted is with regards him to the overall exhibition of evidence and discussion of fact that exist within the article. Firstly, even though data is represente d and sources are cited effectively, the type and extent of this data does not specifically help to corroborate the initial argument that was stated within the preceding paragraph. Moreover, the article itself ultimately collapses into a mere discussion of the technology that exists and a broader understanding of the process of biological engineering. Although this discussion is of course interesting, it does not coincide with the analysis and promise of engaging the reader in the argument that was initially presented. Instead, these statistics and data that are represented do not help the reader to draw any level of inference with regards to the original argument nor are they particularly helpful in understanding the issue to a greater degree. Although it is true that statistics and data are represented, as well as relevant citations, none of these serve the ultimate purpose and appeared to be somewhat gratuitous; only existing to the fact that they are somehow required. Finally, w ith respect to reviewing the argument in terms of its purpose and audience, it can be definitively stated that the purpose of the argument was to shed a further level of discussion with regards to bioethics and bioengineering. However, in order to engage with the audience, as with any form of print journalism, a type of controversy and fear had to be engaged with regards to the way in which runaway/rogue scientists could impact upon the future fate of the human race, biological development, and/or nouveau eugenics. A further question comes with regards to what group this particular article was developed to appeal to. The readership of whatever source this particular piece was intended for was most certainly primarily engaged with entertainment and the means through which time can be passed at work from one article to the next. In such a way, rather than coming down too hard on this particular article and slamming it as having no logic or development of facts whatsoever, it must be u nderstood that the same level of comparison cannot be expected of wired.com as